Pelmeni Period BOrigin theory CVerified

Pelmeni are the small Siberian parcels of minced meat, wrapped in thinly rolled dough and boiled. As a kind of dish they seem to go back to the late medieval and early modern period, but the name appears in Russian writing rather late, and a gap opens between the age of the food and the first time it was recorded.

The ingredients were all at home in this land. Wheat, and the minced pork, beef, and mutton, were long-familiar things that the Urals and Siberia could readily supply. What gave the dish its form was the handwork of rolling the dough thin, wrapping the meat, and boiling it, together with how neatly that suited life in a cold country.

Wrapped and boiled, pelmeni keep well once frozen. Through the long Siberian winter they were made in quantity and stored in the snow, a preserved food and a daily one, boiled only as much as was needed. Then, in the mid-nineteenth century, the railway carried the dumpling across the whole of Russia, pushing a regional keeping-food out into a food of the entire country.

Pelmeni's beginning comes down in two stories, apart in geography and in people alike.

One sees them arising among the native peoples of the Urals and Siberia — the Komi, Udmurt, Mansi and other Finno-Ugric peoples — and derives the name from the Komi and Udmurt pelnyan, ear-bread (pel, ear; nyan, bread). When Russians moved east in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and spread across the Urals and Siberia, so the account runs, they took up the local food and raised it into a dish of their own. The linguistic evidence for this line has grown firmer of late. Vasmer's etymological dictionary parses pelnyan in its text as ear plus bread, and notes that whether the borrowing came from Komi or Udmurt cannot be pinned down. The Komi scholars Lytkin and Gulyaev read pel as the common Permic word for ear and nyan as bread borrowed from an Indo-European, Indo-Iranian source. The word's origin points to the Permic peoples who lived in the Cis-Urals from the ninth to the thirteenth century.

The other is the Chinese-and-Mongol account. Pelmeni as a boiled parcel are taken as a simplified adaptation of the Chinese dumpling, carried by the Mongols from China to Siberia and the Urals. Tellingly, one early instance in Russian writing — Semivsky's account of 1817 — sets pelmeni down as a small minced-meat pie resembling the Chinese confection. The record itself leaves an impression of a food come from outside.

Yet all that holds this transmission account up is that one line's impression and the overlap of form — dough, filling, shaping, and cooking are much alike. On the food-history side too, there are writers who name wonton as the most reasonable candidate while admitting that no firm evidence can be offered. A boiled wrapped dumpling can arise separately in many places, so a single resemblance of form is no proof of transmission.

The two stories tie in with a further view: that similar dishes came by several routes — Crimean Tatar, Dagestani, Central Asian — in different eras. The name appears in writing with Semivsky in 1817; Avdeyeva in 1837 records it as a Siberian dialect word, and Radetzky in 1855 gives a concrete recipe of pork or venison with onion. All fall in the late early-modern to early nineteenth century, far later than the age of the dish itself. A first record shows not when a food was born but when it came to be written down. In short, it will not fit into a single origin. The very either-or of Russian-born or come-from-outside does not apply to this dish from the start.