All dishes / Middle East & North Africa
Pilav Period BOrigin theory CVerified
Some fields (dish name, region and gates) are shown from the Japanese-edition data.
In Anatolia, where rice was still a costly newcomer, grains cooked in butter became pilav: a branch of the Persian polow that took root at the Ottoman table.
Verification highlight popular claim → verdict → evidence
The Turkish name pilav comes straight from Persian pulao/polow, and the dish is generally seen as a branch of the Persian rice dish that took root at the Ottoman court. The oldest surviving Turkish-language cookbook, Sirvani's Kitabu't-Tabih Tercumesi (reign of Murad II, c. 1438-1451), an expanded translation of al-Baghdadi's 13th-century Arabic Kitab al-Tabikh, already includes rice dishes, so the dish was part of Ottoman cooking by about 1440 at the latest, though a first appearance in writing is not the date of origin. Main source: Sirvani, Kitabu't-Tabih Tercumesi.
The three gates
- Ingredient-supply gate
- Rice reached Anatolia through Old World trade and became a local crop; where rice was too costly, bulgur wheat served as a substitute.
- Cooking-technique gate
- Rice is browned in butter, then simmered in stock until the liquid is absorbed, in the Ottoman style.
- Venue gate
- Began as Ottoman court cuisine before becoming a staple side dish in Anatolian cities and homes.
Overview
Pilav is a staple of Anatolia in which rice is first sauteed in butter and then cooked through in stock. Grains that have drunk up chicken broth, moist and tender, are indispensable at the table both as a main and as a side.
Rice, the dish's lead ingredient, was a relatively new food in Anatolia. It came into Ottoman lands by way of Persia and the Mamluk Empire, and it reached the court first. According to a study of rice cultivation in the early modern Ottoman Empire, the earliest document of rice being grown in Anatolia concerns Aydın, on the Büyük Menderes River, in 1480.
From the fifteenth century onward, as the prestige of rice rose under the influence of Iranian culture, pilav came to be eaten as a dish of the Ottoman court, and in time spread to the cities and homes as a staple and a side. The Turkish name pilav was carried over directly from the Persian polow (also pulao), marking the branch of the pilaf family that took root in Anatolia.
Where rice was dear, pilav was also made from bulgur (cracked wheat). Rice pilav was the prestige food of court and city, while bulgur pilav was the everyday staple and side of the inland and the common table, and the two ran side by side according to region and rank.
How we know
That pilav branched off from the Persian rice dish shows first of all in its name. The Turkish pilav is plainly carried over from the Persian pulao and polow.
One book makes the route of transmission clear. The oldest surviving Turkish cookbook, Sirvani's Kitabu't-Tabih Tercumesi (from the reign of Murad II, around 1438 to 1451), is an expanded translation of the thirteenth-century Arabic cookbook of the Abbasid tradition, al-Baghdadi's Kitab al-Tabikh, and it includes rice dishes. Its author was a court physician from Shirvan, steeped in Persian culture, and the path by which the Persian and Abbasid ancestral form was taken into the Ottoman court is inscribed in this very volume. That it was set down in a cookbook by around 1440 tells us that pilav existed as an Ottoman dish at least by that time. Still, the year a dish first appears in writing is not necessarily the year of its birth.
To regard this dish as a matter of rice alone is to miss the reality of the region. Because rice was long expensive and scarce in Anatolia, pilav was made not only from rice but also from bulgur, cracked wheat. Rice pilav was the prestige food of court and city, bulgur pilav the everyday staple and side of the inland and the common people; the two systems coexisted by region and by class (a study of risiculture and environmental change in the Early Modern Ottoman Balkans documents this coexistence). In holding together both faces, the prestige surrounding the newcomer rice and the daily fare made with grain, the dish reflects the road pilav travelled in Anatolia.
The full set of origin theories and the detailed verification log — traceable all the way to their sources — are available on the Japanese edition.
See the full origin theories and verification log (Japanese) →
Related dishes
Lineage Family, predecessor, variants
Cross-links Sister dishes & same-name dishes (separate lineage)
Shares an ingredient
- MujaddaraLevant (Syria, Lebanon, Palestine)
- MaqlubaPalestine / Levant
- MandiHadhramaut (Yemen)
- KabsaSaudi Arabia
- MachboosPersian Gulf (Bahrain / Kuwait)
- KoshariEgypt
- Rice-and-lentil koshari (before pasta and tomato)Egypt
- MahshiEgypt
- Mazbi (madhbi)Yemen (Hadhramaut)
- BiryaniSouth Asia (Deccan / Mughal)
and 22 more.
Similar dishes Closeness in region, period and ingredient origin
- MantiAnatolia (Turkey)1000–1500Why similar: same region (Anatolia) · ingredient of the same origin
- Circassian chicken (Çerkez tavuğu)Turkey (Ottoman court) / Caucasus1865–1900Why similar: same region (Anatolia) · ingredient of the same origin
- LahmacunAnatolia1850–1950Why similar: same region (Anatolia) · ingredient of the same origin
- KöfteAnatolia (Turkey)1300–1600Why similar: same region (Anatolia) · ingredient of the same origin